What replacement rent is required?
Back-solve for the minimum market rent per leasable square foot that produces enough NOI to cover the chosen land, hard, and soft costs at the required yield.
Use one development model in two directions: solve for the rent needed to justify a land cost, or solve for the land price supported by a market rent.
Created by Desen Lin for instructional use at Cal State Fullerton
A project is feasible only when its stabilized yield on total development cost meets the required return.
Back-solve for the minimum market rent per leasable square foot that produces enough NOI to cover the chosen land, hard, and soft costs at the required yield.
Capitalize the stabilized NOI at the required return, then subtract hard and soft costs. The remainder is the residual value available for land.
Move market rent or land cost continuously. Both inverse solutions and the feasibility chart update from the same assumptions.
The market rent is $0.41 above the replacement rent.
The current land cost is $2.70 below the maximum.
The current project is the orange point. Its vertical projection gives replacement rent; its horizontal projection gives maximum land cost.
The transparent calculation chain makes the inverse solutions directly auditable.
| Calculation | Current value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Effective rent per LSF | $36.10 | Market rent × occupancy |
| Rental revenue per GSF | $25.27 | Effective rent × efficiency |
| Stabilized NOI per GSF | $15.27 | Revenue − operating costs |
| Yield on cost | 10.18% | NOI ÷ total development cost |
| Replacement rent per GSF | $25.00 | Required return × cost + operating costs |
| Replacement rent per LSF | $37.59 | Replacement rent per GSF ÷ efficiency ÷ occupancy |
| Maximum land cost per GSF | $32.70 | NOI ÷ required return − soft costs − hard costs |
Feasibility is jointly determined by revenue, costs, building efficiency, and the required return.
A higher land price requires a higher replacement rent. A stronger market rent supports a higher residual land value.
Quoted rent is per leasable square foot, while development costs are per gross square foot. Space loss and vacancy reduce the revenue available to support cost.
If maximum land cost is negative, the project cannot meet the required return even with free land; rent, design, or non-land costs must change.